🚗🏍️ Welcome to Motoshare!

Turning Idle Vehicles into Shared Rides & New Earnings.
Why let your bike or car sit idle when it can earn for you and move someone else forward?

From Idle to Income. From Parked to Purpose.
Earn by Sharing, Ride by Renting.
Where Owners Earn, Riders Move.
Owners Earn. Riders Move. Motoshare Connects.

With Motoshare, every parked vehicle finds a purpose. Partners earn. Renters ride. Everyone wins.

Start Your Journey with Motoshare

Best Security Platform Engineering Freelancers & Consultant in United States


What is Security Platform Engineering?

Security Platform Engineering is the practice of designing, building, and operating reusable security capabilities as an internal platform—so product teams can ship software quickly while still meeting security and compliance expectations. Instead of relying on ad-hoc reviews or one-off scripts, it focuses on repeatable guardrails, automation, and self-service workflows that fit naturally into modern delivery pipelines.

It matters because most security failures at scale are not caused by missing “security tools,” but by inconsistent implementation: different teams configuring identity, logging, secrets, and deployment controls in different ways. A good Security Platform Engineering approach standardizes the “secure defaults,” reduces manual security toil, and makes it easier to prove compliance without slowing delivery.

It’s for platform engineers, DevOps/SRE teams, cloud engineers, security engineers (including AppSec and cloud security), and security-minded developers—typically at intermediate to senior levels. In practice, many organizations in the United States bring in Freelancers & Consultant to accelerate the initial platform build, run targeted workshops for internal teams, or provide short-term expertise for high-impact initiatives (like secure CI/CD, identity modernization, or Kubernetes hardening).

Typical skills/tools learned and applied include:

  • Linux fundamentals, networking, and security basics (TLS, authn/authz, hardening)
  • Git workflows and CI/CD design with security gates and approvals
  • Infrastructure as Code (Terraform and similar), including secure module patterns
  • Policy as code (e.g., Open Policy Agent concepts) and guardrail design
  • Secrets management (Vault concepts, cloud secret managers, rotation workflows)
  • Cloud IAM (AWS, Azure, GCP patterns), least privilege, and privileged access controls
  • Container and Kubernetes security (RBAC, admission control concepts, image hygiene)
  • Vulnerability management in pipelines (SAST/DAST concepts, dependency risk, SBOM workflows)
  • Security logging/telemetry (centralized logs, alerting, detection engineering basics)
  • Incident response readiness (runbooks, automation, and operational handoffs)

Scope of Security Platform Engineering Freelancers & Consultant in United States

Demand for Security Platform Engineering in the United States is closely tied to three trends: cloud adoption, rapid software delivery, and regulatory pressure. As organizations shift to containerized workloads, managed Kubernetes, and multi-account cloud architectures, they need secure-by-default patterns that can scale across teams and business units. At the same time, boards and customers increasingly ask for evidence of controls—not just “we run a scanner.”

In the United States, this work shows up across a broad range of industries. SaaS companies often need strong identity, secrets, and supply-chain security as they scale. Fintech and healthcare teams face stricter compliance requirements and audit cycles. Government-adjacent organizations (including contractors) frequently have additional security baselines and documentation expectations. Even smaller startups may need a lightweight security platform so a lean engineering team can move fast without accumulating unmanaged risk.

Company size also affects engagement style. Startups may hire Freelancers & Consultant to bootstrap secure CI/CD, logging, and access control quickly, then transition ownership to internal engineers. Mid-market companies may need a consultant to standardize multiple product teams onto a single “paved road.” Enterprises often need targeted platform components (policy enforcement, secrets, telemetry, evidence automation) integrated into existing governance and tooling.

Delivery formats in the United States vary widely:

  • Remote workshops and online cohorts for distributed teams
  • Short bootcamp-style intensives focused on hands-on labs
  • Corporate training for platform/security teams, often mapped to internal standards
  • Advisory + implementation support (pairing on pipelines, IaC modules, or Kubernetes guardrails)

Typical learning paths usually start with platform foundations (Linux, networking, cloud, containers) and then add security-specific engineering patterns. Prerequisites commonly include comfort with the command line, Git, basic scripting, and an understanding of CI/CD and cloud primitives. For teams, it helps if at least some engineers already maintain pipelines and IaC—because Security Platform Engineering is as much about operating and evolving systems as it is about designing them.

Scope factors that commonly shape Security Platform Engineering projects and training engagements in the United States:

  • Cloud footprint complexity (single cloud vs. multi-cloud; number of accounts/subscriptions/projects)
  • Kubernetes/container adoption level (development-only vs. production at scale)
  • CI/CD maturity (manual releases vs. automated pipelines with change controls)
  • Compliance needs (SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP, NIST 800-53 alignment)
  • Identity model (SSO, MFA requirements, service accounts, break-glass access)
  • Secrets and key management approach (rotation, ownership, auditability, segregation of duties)
  • Supply-chain security expectations (SBOM generation, artifact signing, provenance controls)
  • Telemetry and detection integration (central logging, alerting workflows, on-call readiness)
  • Environment separation and data sensitivity (dev/test/prod isolation, tenant segmentation)
  • Operating model (central platform team vs. federated ownership across product teams)

Quality of Best Security Platform Engineering Freelancers & Consultant in United States

Quality in Security Platform Engineering is easiest to judge when you focus on evidence: what the trainer or consultant can show, how they structure hands-on practice, and whether they can adapt to real production constraints. A polished slide deck is not enough—this discipline is about building durable systems that reduce risk and friction over time.

For the United States market, quality also means being fluent in how security programs actually operate: audits, incident response, change management, and cross-team ownership. The best Freelancers & Consultant typically communicate clearly with both engineers and security/compliance stakeholders, and they document decisions so internal teams can maintain the platform after the engagement.

Use the checklist below to evaluate programs, trainers, and independent consultants without relying on hype or guarantees:

  • Curriculum depth and practical labs: Labs go beyond “hello world” and include realistic failure modes (misconfigurations, credential leaks, policy violations).
  • Real-world projects and assessments: Learners build something end-to-end (e.g., a secure pipeline + IaC module + policy checks) and get evaluated via scenarios or code review.
  • Instructor credibility (only if publicly stated): Public speaking, publications, open-source contributions, or prior training track record are clearly described; otherwise, “Not publicly stated.”
  • Mentorship and support: Office hours, Q&A channels, feedback loops, and post-session support are defined up front (not implied).
  • Career relevance and outcomes (avoid guarantees): Outcomes are framed as skills and artifacts produced—not “job guaranteed” claims.
  • Tools and cloud platforms covered: Coverage matches your stack (AWS/Azure/GCP, Kubernetes, Terraform, policy tooling, secrets, CI/CD) and is updated for current practices.
  • Class size and engagement: Interaction is designed in (labs, discussions, reviews), and the format fits your team (small group vs. large cohort).
  • Certification alignment (only if known): If alignment to certifications is claimed, there’s a clear mapping; otherwise, “Not publicly stated.”
  • Operational readiness: Training includes runbooks, alerting, incident response touchpoints, and ownership models—not just build-time controls.
  • Security of the training itself: Labs avoid exposing real credentials, teach safe handling of secrets, and include cost controls for cloud lab environments.
  • Documentation quality: Materials are reusable (templates, checklists, reference architectures) and easy to hand off to internal teams.
  • Measurable impact: The engagement defines how success will be measured (reduced manual approvals, consistent policy enforcement, faster evidence collection), while acknowledging results “Varies / depends.”

Top Security Platform Engineering Freelancers & Consultant in United States

The individuals below are widely recognized through publicly available work such as books, industry talks, or community leadership (not LinkedIn). Availability for freelance or consulting engagements can change over time, so treat this list as a starting point and validate fit, scope, and scheduling directly.

Trainer #1 — Rajesh Kumar

  • Website: https://www.rajeshkumar.xyz/
  • Introduction: Rajesh Kumar maintains a public website and is presented as a technical trainer/consultant. For Security Platform Engineering teams, this kind of profile is often a good fit when you need practical enablement around delivery automation, operational workflows, and hands-on engineering habits that support secure platforms. Specific employer history, certifications, and detailed Security Platform Engineering curriculum coverage are “Not publicly stated.”

Trainer #2 — Shannon Lietz

  • Website: Not publicly stated
  • Introduction: Shannon Lietz is publicly known for long-standing DevSecOps advocacy and community leadership, which aligns closely with Security Platform Engineering’s goal of scaling secure practices through automation and culture. Her perspective is useful for teams trying to turn security controls into repeatable engineering workflows, rather than ticket-driven reviews. Independent consulting availability and engagement terms are “Not publicly stated.”

Trainer #3 — Liz Rice

  • Website: Not publicly stated
  • Introduction: Liz Rice is widely recognized for education and thought leadership in container and Kubernetes security—topics that frequently sit at the center of modern Security Platform Engineering programs. Her material is especially relevant when your platform roadmap includes runtime isolation, image hygiene, and secure-by-default Kubernetes patterns. Availability for United States engagements “Varies / depends,” and consulting/training formats are “Not publicly stated.”

Trainer #4 — Tanya Janca

  • Website: Not publicly stated
  • Introduction: Tanya Janca is publicly known as an application security educator and author, and her work maps well to the “developer experience” side of Security Platform Engineering. This is valuable when your security platform must integrate smoothly into CI/CD and developer workflows (secure coding, threat modeling habits, and practical AppSec controls). Specific consulting availability and pricing “Varies / depends.”

Trainer #5 — Jim Manico

  • Website: Not publicly stated
  • Introduction: Jim Manico is broadly recognized in the application security community and is often associated with practical, engineer-facing security training. For Security Platform Engineering, that translates well into building secure SDLC guardrails, choosing effective pipeline checks, and reducing false positives through better patterns and reviews. Current engagement availability and delivery options in the United States are “Not publicly stated.”

Choosing the right trainer for Security Platform Engineering in United States usually comes down to fit: your cloud stack, your delivery maturity, and your compliance obligations. Ask for a sample lab or outline, confirm what hands-on artifacts you’ll keep (templates, reference pipelines, policy examples), and make sure the engagement includes time for review and iteration—because security platforms improve through feedback cycles, not one-time installs.

More profiles (LinkedIn): https://www.linkedin.com/in/rajeshkumarin/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/imashwani/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/gufran-jahangir/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/ravi-kumar-zxc/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/dharmendra-kumar-developer/


Contact Us

  • contact@devopsfreelancer.com
  • +91 7004215841
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x